Note that whilst the original post was uncompromisingly critical of the GRO's new online index, we now know that the incorrect age for one of the individuals was recorded in the printed version of the contemporary quarterly index, and that the post itself included the wrong spelling of the individuals' surname.
Perhaps you can now understand why I defend modern transcribers - who generally have to interpret monochrome microfilmed images of old handwriting. sometimes written in pencil or (more often) scratched with a quill pen, relating to people of whom they know nothing!
Perhaps you can now understand why I defend modern transcribers - who generally have to interpret monochrome microfilmed images of old handwriting. sometimes written in pencil or (more often) scratched with a quill pen, relating to people of whom they know nothing!