Liberty
LostCousins Megastar
I wonder if some kind soul can explain something to me.
A relative is listed on the Chatham Naval Memorial, with a date of death of Feb. 28, 1946. (that's all the info - name, rank, and date of death)
I appreciate that the CWGC people would recognise people as being casualties of war if they died of wounds within a certain period after end of hostilities. (Does anyone know when this was for WWII?)
However, I also understand that the Chatham Naval Memorial is for war dead without a known grave (which is quite a lot of naval personnel, of course). This seems to suggest that my chap didn't die as a result of wounds received but was lost at sea. And if you were lost at sea in 1946 (even if still in the Navy) how would it be a war death? Anybody know?
My best guess would be if he was involved in, say, mine clearance in the months immediately after the war and the ship was sunk - would this qualify him for the Chatham Naval Memorial?
A relative is listed on the Chatham Naval Memorial, with a date of death of Feb. 28, 1946. (that's all the info - name, rank, and date of death)
I appreciate that the CWGC people would recognise people as being casualties of war if they died of wounds within a certain period after end of hostilities. (Does anyone know when this was for WWII?)
However, I also understand that the Chatham Naval Memorial is for war dead without a known grave (which is quite a lot of naval personnel, of course). This seems to suggest that my chap didn't die as a result of wounds received but was lost at sea. And if you were lost at sea in 1946 (even if still in the Navy) how would it be a war death? Anybody know?
My best guess would be if he was involved in, say, mine clearance in the months immediately after the war and the ship was sunk - would this qualify him for the Chatham Naval Memorial?