I've also puzzled over the administrative details implied by the records of out-pensions found in the Chelsea lists, like Peter in the mid-December newsletter.
They must have received their money from a pay office, and I think these were part of the army's territorial structure. I presume this would also deal with reserves, recruitment, and other interactions with the home population (e.g. billeting and transport).
I have a record with a column headed "district 1865", in which are entries such as:
1 No London
2 West London
1 Belfast
2 Plymouth
1 East London
1 E[squiggle] London
From that I conclude that the numbers are for places with more than one district office, and abbreviating East London to 1 E and L each with a vague squiggle after it produces what is in Peter's example.
They must have received their money from a pay office, and I think these were part of the army's territorial structure. I presume this would also deal with reserves, recruitment, and other interactions with the home population (e.g. billeting and transport).
I have a record with a column headed "district 1865", in which are entries such as:
1 No London
2 West London
1 Belfast
2 Plymouth
1 East London
1 E[squiggle] London
From that I conclude that the numbers are for places with more than one district office, and abbreviating East London to 1 E and L each with a vague squiggle after it produces what is in Peter's example.
Last edited: