Bryman
LostCousins Megastar
I have always been pleased when I find an ancestor with an unusual forename as that makes identification within a group of records so much easier. However, I felt so sorry for a baby recently given what I thought was a first and would remain unique, but apparently that is not so. I am glad that my parents had the common sense to give me the traditional names that they did.
The unique name that isn't is Abcde, pronounced "Ab-si-dee"! Apparently there are over 300 babies that have been given that name in USA over the last decade! Presumably that makes subsequent names for further children a no-brainer (!!!), such as fghij and klmno, etc, but I fear that things could very easily get out of control. Census enumerators are now getting more respect from me.
Has any other member come across anything this unusual, or worse? Apparently, there is a baby-name-wizard web site which suggests that a suitable diminutive might be "seedy". As I say, out of control!
Another difficult name to pronounce might be Kviiilyn (Kaitlyn?) but now living in NZ I find many Maori names (both of people and places) difficult to say, so often I refrain from even attempting to do so.
The unique name that isn't is Abcde, pronounced "Ab-si-dee"! Apparently there are over 300 babies that have been given that name in USA over the last decade! Presumably that makes subsequent names for further children a no-brainer (!!!), such as fghij and klmno, etc, but I fear that things could very easily get out of control. Census enumerators are now getting more respect from me.
Has any other member come across anything this unusual, or worse? Apparently, there is a baby-name-wizard web site which suggests that a suitable diminutive might be "seedy". As I say, out of control!
Another difficult name to pronounce might be Kviiilyn (Kaitlyn?) but now living in NZ I find many Maori names (both of people and places) difficult to say, so often I refrain from even attempting to do so.

