• Only registered members can see all the forums - if you've received an invitation to join (it'll be on your My Summary page) please register NOW!

  • If you're looking for the LostCousins site please click the logo in the top left corner - these forums are for existing LostCousins members only.
  • This is the LostCousins Forum. If you were looking for the LostCousins website simply click the logo at the top left.
  • It's easier than ever before to check your entries from the 1881 Census - more details here

Who owned this 17th century notebook?

peter

Administrator
Staff member
I spotted this item for sale at an auction house which is just around the corner from my favourite eye hospital:

upload_2025-4-21_9-59-14.png

According to the auction particulars there is a family story about the ownership of the book which is now in doubt. We can't see all the pages but I noticed some entries regarding money loaned to a Mary Escott, described as a cousin, and this seems a useful clue.

It would be an interesting challenge to identify the owner before it goes up for sale on 1st May.

London is the obvious place to begin the search, but searching the parish registers at Ancestry there are very few entries for Mary Escott. However this 25th May 1660 baptism at St Andrew, Holborn offers one possibility:

upload_2025-4-21_10-9-22.png

However I can't find a marriage in London and the family don't seem to appear in any Ancestry trees. Any other clues? It doesn't help that events during the interregnum were not necessarily recorded in parish registers.
 
They certainly were well connected! There's references to coronations, kings robes, fees for the house of commons, etc.

I am wondering if she was the mother Mary, married to William, rather than the daughter? The entries on the page previous refer to "Cousin Escott" rather than the very specific line to Mary Escott, which made me ponder if William is his cousin and then perhaps passed, so now the notes were to cousin Mary instead of her husband.

CoPilot said, and I think its fairly accurate transcription, the rest of the page says:

"Cousin Escott
came to me for
sept: 25:63

Dec: Sat: 5 : pd.
Dec : Sat: 19 : pd.
Dec: Tues: 22 : pd.

Cousin Escott owes
me for debt. 12 +

Cos Mary Escott wit
me a quartr of a
year more"
 
Back
Top