Bob Spiers
LostCousins Superstar
I wish family mysteries could be cleared up so quickly, but in the course of half a day since replying to Phil, I received a PM from a subscriber to the BHF about the 'Ackerdock' query posted long ago and re-activated by my cousin. In the PM he explains there was indeed a proper AQUEDUCT about a quarter of a mile back from the Drawbridge. This is the Aqueduct that later morphed into Ackerdock(s).
He reminded of the of the very tall bridge over the road that ran a right angles to the canal and well before the drawbridge? After the bridge was a ford that was fun to ride through on our bikes and hills either side for (what would later be called) 'off-road' biking. Well it had been a very long time, but I did indeed recall the road, the very tall bridge, and especially the water ford and the fun had when cycling up and down the hills. He then said that road was Aqueduct Road and the bridge supported an aqueduct over which ran the canal.
He accepted that if cycling along the canal towpath one might not be aware that the canal was at high elevation to the roads below and perhaps not take in the bridge rampart at the side of the tow path. I had also not considered the fact that Drawbridge road was a hill that one needed to ascend to reach the canal level.
So bottom line my assumption that Ackerdock was a corruption of Aqueduct was correct, but I now know the drawbridge played no part except for its location at the Ackerdocks
.
He reminded of the of the very tall bridge over the road that ran a right angles to the canal and well before the drawbridge? After the bridge was a ford that was fun to ride through on our bikes and hills either side for (what would later be called) 'off-road' biking. Well it had been a very long time, but I did indeed recall the road, the very tall bridge, and especially the water ford and the fun had when cycling up and down the hills. He then said that road was Aqueduct Road and the bridge supported an aqueduct over which ran the canal.
He accepted that if cycling along the canal towpath one might not be aware that the canal was at high elevation to the roads below and perhaps not take in the bridge rampart at the side of the tow path. I had also not considered the fact that Drawbridge road was a hill that one needed to ascend to reach the canal level.
So bottom line my assumption that Ackerdock was a corruption of Aqueduct was correct, but I now know the drawbridge played no part except for its location at the Ackerdocks
